1 minute to get to know the CPU to buy multi-core or high frequency?

Several people on the small partner's weekend message have been asking what CPU to buy. If you just look at the money, then Xiaobian's answer is definitely the most expensive one that is within your economic tolerance. However, because everyone's needs are not the same, the CPU can really not rely on money to measure it, and today Xiaobian talks about the mistakes when choosing CPUs.

Multi-core or main frequency?

Let's talk about the relationship and difference between multi-core and main frequency. In particular, many small partners do not know exactly what they need, so they are still explained in the two directions that affect the performance.

First of all, game-type requirements, in general, the game is more dual-core calls, more multi-core. Because the game requires the simplest and most crude calculations, the multi-core is a bit useless in this regard. In other words, many core CPUs are half-idle when playing games, and the utilization rate is not high. Oh yeah, Xiao Bian wants to remind everyone that the so-called multi-core Xiaobian refers to more than 4 cores (including) of the CPU.

By the way, when Turbo frequency technology improves frequency, not all cores can go to the highest value. When Turbo frequency is increased, the method of upgrading according to different CPUs is different. In the highest Turbo frequency state, only a single core can reach the highest value, while in the dual core Turbo frequency state, it is lower (mostly 100MHz) or consistent than the highest core frequency; when the three cores and four cores are in the core frequency state, the basic It also decrements the highest RBF value by 100MHz. The reason is simple. Raising the single-core frequency is helpful for games that are more dependent on CPU frequency.

In fact, from the CPU's multi-threading technology can see this clue - multi-threading continues to be nothing more than to continue to squeeze a single CPU core processor capabilities, so that the work tasks to fully fill the CPU load, otherwise, why not really do more multi-core Optimize, and go back and write on single-core processing capabilities on multi-core processors? Specific small series in the "moving brick to buy CPU must see! "I already said it, and I don't have much to say here. Again, there is a demand for work, especially for design work. Multi-core is much more important than high-frequency. Multi-core and multi-thread parallel processing is very important for design work, especially for rendering and ah, but the frequency is secondary. Of course, this requires faster and larger caches (or even the mechanism of cache work) to help the CPU temporarily store a large amount of operational data. In short, such application requirements are pursuing fine calculations. Unlike games, which are as simple and crude, “multiplayer” is the best processor method.

To some extent, multi-core processors can also cover a lot of game-type requirements, after all, their own clock speed is not bad, such as the 7700K processor, single-threaded performance is strong enough, multi-core capabilities are one of the best; there is like Ryzen 1700X, Ryzen1800X this kind of processor, in the form of misplaced competition will be multi-core multi-threaded decentralized to the high-end player market (professional market needs more multi-core multi-threading); there is a CPU for professional applications, such as Intel will soon launch The i9 series processor, multi-core multi-threading more in line with the requirements of professional applications.

Recommended processor

Uses: Games

2 core CPU:

Intel Core i3 7350K

Second only to the 7700K single-core single-threaded performance processor, especially the chip prices are more cost-effective, the game player's most cost-effective choice, it seems this guy does not support Turbo frequency technology, it is because of its own frequency is astonishing - The 4.2GHz operating frequency has no problem with the game.

Uses: Games + general design work, such as PS, etc.

4 core CPUs:

AMD Ryzen 5 1500X

4 core 8 thread design, clocked at 3.5 GHz, speed up to 3.7 GHz, deal with the game is stronger than the i5 7500, can afford 3A game masterpiece. It is almost a versatile, all-embracing.

Uses: professional design work + game talent

4 core CPUs: Intel Core i7 7700/K

The same 4 core 8 thread design, i7 application performance in professional design class work, the game is not out of line. This is thanks to the 3.6GHz clock frequency (4.2GHz Core frequency), and the actual test shows that the 7700/K is one of the most powerful single-core CPUs available today. It has no problem with the game. With a 4-core 8-thread CPU design, When dealing with professional design work, it can also be performed with ease.

Of course, if the budget is tight Pentium series can choose, or wait and see the arrival of Ryzen 3 (faster, Xiao Bian has answered many times, listed in the third quarter); if it is focused on designing applications, such as Movie clips, animation renderings, etc., Core i9 is a better choice, Xiao Bian is not here to say so much, hope that today's push can help the little partner to choose their own needs of the CPU, there is a problem comment message oh.